Historia de la dermatoscopia. Un viaje a través del tiempo

Gabriel Salerni; Horacio Cabo

doi:10.47196/da.v30i2.2581

Authors

Gabriel Salerni Rosario Centennial Provincial Hospital, National University of Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
Horacio Cabo University of Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47196/da.v30i2.2581

Keywords:

dermoscopy, dermatoscope, history, early diagnosis

Abstract

The history of dermoscopy represents a fascinating journey from its first steps to its current position as a fundamental tool in medical practice. Over the years, dermoscopy has undergone a continuous evolution, from the first observations with elementary equipment, through the advent of the handheld dermatoscope until the sophisticated digital and computer-assisted analysis technologies use nowadays. This article discusses the origins, key milestones and significant contributions that have marked the course of the history of dermoscopy, highlighting its importance in the early and accurate diagnosis of a wide range of skin diseases.

Author Biographies

Gabriel Salerni, Rosario Centennial Provincial Hospital, National University of Rosario, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina

Dermatologist, Doctor of Medicine

Horacio Cabo, University of Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Dermatologist, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of Dermatology

References

I. Chabbert P. Pierre Borel (1620 ?-1671). In: Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications. Tome 21, N°4, 1968;303-343.

II. Buch J, Criton S. Dermoscopy saga: a tale of 5 centuries. Indian J Dermatol. 2021;66:174-178.

III. Hueter C. Die Cheilangioskopie, eine neuen Untersuchungsmethode zu physiologischen und pathologischen Zwe- cken. Centralb Med Wissensch. 1879;13:225-227.

IV. Unna P. Die Diaskopie der Hautkrankhiten. Berl Klin Wochenschr. 1893;42:1016-1021.

V. Unna P. Uber das pigment des pigment der menschlichen haut. Monatsh Prakt Dermatol. 1885;6:277-294.

VI. Saphier J. Die Dermatoskopie, I. Mitteilung. Arch Dermatol Syph. 1921;128:1-19.

VII. Saphier J. Die Dermatoskopie, III. Mitteilung. Arch Dermatol Syph. 1921;134: 314-322.

VIII. Saphier J. Die Dermatoskopie, IV. Mitteilung. Arch Dermatol Syph. 1921;136:149-158.

IX. Saphier J. Die Dermatoskopie II. Mitteilung. Arch Dermatol Syph. 1921;132:69-86.

X. Michael JC. Dermatoscopy. Arch Dermatol Syph. 1922;6:167-178.

XI. Goldman L. Some investigative studies of pigmented nevi with cutaneous nevi with cutaneous microscopy. J Invest Dermatol. 1951;16:407-426.

XII. Goldman L. A simple portable skin microscope for surface microscopy. Arch Dermatol. 1958;78:246-247.

XIII. Mackie RM. An aid to the preoperative assessment of pigmented lesions of the skin. Br J Dermatol. 1971;85:232-238.

XIV. Kreusch J, Rassner G. Das auflichtmikroskopie bild lentiginoser junktionsnavi. Hauzart. 1990;41:274-276.

XV. Braun-Falco O, Stolz W, Bilek P, Merkle T, et ál. Das Dermatoskop. Eine Veeinfachung der Auflichtmi-kroskopie von pigmentierten Hautveranderungen. Hautarzt. 1990;41:131-136.

XVI. Pehamberger H, Steiner A, Wolff K. In vivo epiluminis- cence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17:571-583.

XVII. Soyer HP, Smolle J, Hödl S, Pachernegg H, et ál. Surface microscopy: a new approach to the diagnosis of cutaneous pigmented tumors. Am J Dermatopathol. 1989;11:1-10

XVIII. Stolz W, Riemann A, Cognetta AB. ABCD rule of dermatoscopy: a new practical method for early recognition of malignant melanoma. Eur J Dermatol. 1994;4:521-527.

XIX. Menzies S, Ingvar C, Mc Carthy W. A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma. Melanoma Res. 1996;6:55-62.

XX. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, et ál. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134:1563-1570.

XXI. Kittler H, Rosendahl C, Cameron A, Tschandl P. Dermatoscopy: pattern analysis of pigmented and non pigmented lesions. Facultas. wuv Universitäts, 2016. ISBN 370891385X, 9783708913858.

XXII. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3:159-165.

XXIII. Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159:669-676.

XXIV. Pizzichetta MA, Talamini R, Piccolo D, Argenziano G, et ál. The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy does not apply to small melanocytic skin lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137:1376-1378.

XXV. Salerni G, Terán T, Puig S, Malvehy J, et ál. Meta-analysis of digital dermoscopy follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions: a study on behalf of the International Dermoscopy Society. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:805-814.

XXVI. Hekler A, Utikal JS, Enk AH, Hauschild A, et ál. Superior skin cancer classification by the combination of human and artificial intelligence. Eur J Cancer. 2019;120:114-121.

XXVII. Sgouros D, Apalla Z, Ionnides D, Katoulis A, et ál. Dermoscopy of common inflammatory disorders. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36:359-368.

XXVIII. Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy in general dermatology: a practical overview. Dermatol Ther. 2016;6:471-507.

XXIX. Rudnicka L, Olszewska M, Majsterek M, Czuwara J. Present and future of dermoscopy. Exp Rev Dermatol. 2006;1:769-772.