Genital examination and its medicolegal implications

Authors

  • Roberto Glorio University of Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Sergio Carbia University of Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47196/2eeszj33

Keywords:

genital examination, medical-legal implications

Abstract

Complaints against healthcare professionals by patients are commonplace, and the occurrence of cases involving crimes against sexual integrity (e.g., sexual abuse) is particularly noteworthy. Therefore, it is important to be aware of this issue in order to be prepared and act preventively1,2. In the case of dermatology, clinical evaluation involves examining skin pathologies, as well as those of the mucous membranes, including the genitals. Furthermore, the evaluation of genital skin lesions is of utmost importance if a dermatologist needs to diagnose a condition such as lichen planus or lichen sclerosus3,4. In addition, a complete physical examination, including a genital examination, is often required in certain cases, such as vitiligo or psoriasis5,6. And the importance of the dermatologist in the evaluation of venereal or neoplastic pathologies should not be overlooked7-9. Genital examinations present unique challenges in the hospital setting. These include the patient's implied consent upon admission and the need for medical students and residents to learn and apply the knowledge acquired during their training. However, this situation is not without its problems. Clearly, this type of examination can cause discomfort or a sense of invasion in some patients and, occasionally, lead to legal claims10-12. These issues highlight the importance of medico-legal training in dermatology to ensure safe, ethical, and compliant professional practice.

Author Biographies

  • Roberto Glorio, University of Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Associate Professor of Dermatology, Associate Professor of Legal Medicine, Doctor of Medicine, Forensic Physician of the National Justice System, Director of the Specialist Program in Legal Medicine

  • Sergio Carbia, University of Buenos Aires, City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Head of the Dermatology Service, José María Penna General Hospital, Adjunct Professor of Dermatology, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina, Director of the Dermatology Residency Program, Adjunct Professor of Dermatology

References

I. Gisbert-Grifo M, Gisbert-Calabuig JA. Delitos contra la libertad y la indemnidad sexuales. En: Villanueva-Cañadas E, Gisbert-Calabuig JA, Eds. Medicina legal y toxicología. 8º ed. Barcelona Elservier; 2024:633-648.

II. Kvitko LA. Delitos contra la integridad sexual. En: Kvitko LA, Covelli JL, Foyo R, eds.. Medicina legal y deontología médica. 1º Cátedra de Medicina Legal, UBA. 1º ed. Buenos Aires: Dosyuna; 2010:251-273.

III. Vieira-Baptista P, Pérez-López FR, López-Baena MT, Stockdale CK, et al. Risk of development of vulvar cancer in women with lichen sclerosus or lichen planus: a systematic review. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2022;26:250-257.

IV. Amsellem J, Skayem C, Duong TA, Bagot M, et al. Male genital lichen planus: a retrospective study of 89 cases. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2022;149:28-31.

V. Dauendorffer JN, Skayem C, Passeron T. Male genital vitiligo. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2022;149:92-98.

VI. Meeuwis KAP, van de Kerkhof PCM, Massuger LFAG. Patients’ experience of psoriasis in the genital area. Dermatology. 2012;224:271-276.

VII. Català A, García-Hernández D. Recomendaciones de expertos de la AEDV sobre el manejo de infecciones venéreas supurativas. Actas dermosifiliograficas. 2025;116:68-80.

VIII. Dauendorffer JN, Herms F, Baroudjian B, Basset-Seguin N, et al. Penoscrotal Paget’s disease. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2021;148:71-76.

IX. Bajaj S, Wolner ZJ, Dusza SW, Braun RP, et al. Total body skin examination practices. A survey study amongst dermatologists at high-risk skin cancer clinics. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2019;9:132-138.

X. Vijayanathan A, Bruce D, Yiu C, MacAskill F, et al. The use of clinical teaching associates (CTAs) in teaching male intimate examination to medical students: A randomised controlled trial. Med Teach. 2025;47:1225-1230.

XI. Kuraitis D, Murina A. Gender discordance of genital examination experiences among dermatology residents and attendings. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:638-640.

XII. Kuraitis D, Stumpf B, Murina A. Discrepancies by dermatology resident gender in diagnostic confidence and management of female and male genital lichen sclerosus. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26:13030/qt09r2d0n3.

XIII. Cartron AM, Zampella JG. Male genital examinations. Special considerations and pearls for dermatologists. Cutis. 2021;107:E12-E14.

XIV. Dauendorffer JN. Male genital dermatology: Why and how? Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2022;149:1-2.

XV. Silva DH. Autonomía en la relación médico-paciente. Buenos Aires: Dosyuna;2007: 4-10.

XVI. Valesic M, Civljak M, Puljak L. Informed consent and ethics committee involvement in case reports and case series: cross-sectional meta-research study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2025;26:64.

XVII. Ley 26.529/09. Derechos del paciente en su relación con los profesionales e instituciones de la salud. Disponible en: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-26529-160432. Consultado: 30 de junio de 2025

XVIII. Jha V, Setna Z, Al-Hity A, Quinton ND, et al. Patient involvement in teaching and assessing intimate examination skills: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2010;44:347-357.

XIX. Glorio R, Casas-Parera I. Responsabilidad. El médico y el paciente. En: Covelli JL, Pasquariello A, Casas Parera I. Manual de Medicina Legal y Deontología Médica. 21 Ed. Buenos Aires: Edit. Grupo Guía 2016;7-15.

XX. Menéndez-Lucas JA. Manual de medicina legal y forense para estudiantes de medicina. Edit. Elsevier-Barcelona. 2º Ed 2020;64-85.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

Issue

Section

Legal Dermatology